Though monumental tombs in Alexandria
appear almost concurrently with the foundation of the city,
the very earliest burials were unpretentious. Many of the
first settlers were consigned to simple pits or shafts. The
dead were sometimes cremated, but this seems not to have much
effected the type of tomb in which they were interred.
Rectangular or bitrapezoidal graves were cut vertically
into the bedrock from forty centimeters to a meter and a half
in depth. They were sealed with flat stones or, in some rare
cases, with terracotta slabs set horizontally on ledges cut in
the walls of the tomb, so that they remained level with the
surface. In normal burials, that is, those not involving
cremation, the tomb usually held only a single burial, with
the dead laid directly into the limestone pits, often
accompanied by one or more funerary vessels or other
objects.
There were a small number of these pit burials that were
somewhat more elaborate, with a flight of three or four steps
that entered the tomb on its short wall, rather than directly
from the top. This type of tomb included a small vestibule
between the staircase and the tomb itself which, after the
burial, was filled in with sand and rubble. A vertical slab
was used to seal the tomb. This type of tomb was a forerunner
of the latter chamber tomb.
Frequently, funerary monuments such as stelai, altars or
columns were placed either above the tomb or near them, though
many more were simply covered by a low tumulus of earth.
Rarely is one grave found superimposed over another, so the
plots must have been clearly differentiated and kept up during
the life of the cemetery. Even though more elaborate burials
soon appear in Alexandria,
these early pit and shaft grave continued to be used for less
prominent Alexandrians through much of the city's
history.
Very quickly after the founding of Alexandria,
gallery and chamber tombs also make their appearance and they
too continue to be used throughout much of the city's early
history. They differ from pit and shaft tombs in three
important aspects that are clearly evolutionary steps towards
Alexandria's monumental burials. They contain multiple
burials, they utilize loculi to hold the burials and they are
constructed to be entered and to act as the site of the
funerary rites.
The gallery, or corridor tomb is the simplest of these two
intermediate types of burial. They consist of a short,
rock-cut staircase that leads down from the surface into a
long narrow room that can be up to forty meters in length.
This type of tomb is characterized by their walls that
are completely devoted to loculi. During the Ptolemaic period,
the loculi were cut when the necessity arose, and are
therefore irregular, while in Roman times, they were precut
into neat tiers. Interestingly, one Ezbet el-Makhlouf gallery
tomb contained Egyptian motifs, which were rare in early
tombs. It is possible that this burial may have held
culturally conservative ethnic Egyptians.
Though chamber tombs appear to be contemporaneous with
gallery tombs, they seem conceptually to be their successor.
Similar to gallery tombs in most respects, they add a small
vestibule as an intermediary space between the entry stair and
the burial room for the performance of the funerary ritual.
Chamber tombs are thus the immediate predecessors of Alexandria's
monumental tombs.
A fine example of a chamber tomb can be found at Hadra,
which was dated by Adriani to the "high Hellenistic
period", a few generations after the death of Alexander
the Great. It consists of a short stairway leading to a small
vestibule that opened onto a small rectangular room measuring
about two and a half meters long and tall and slightly less in
width, with a roof in the form of a half-vault. In this tomb,
the vestibule contained two loculi cut into the rock at floor
level, and in the rectangular chamber, a beach cut about a
meter high in the rock provided a surface for exposition of
the body and may be considered an early form of a kline. There
was also a rock-cut shelf to the left of
the doorway
leading into the rectangular chamber that was used to deposit
devotional offerings or to set a lamp to provide light during
the funeral service. This type of shelf was also later integrated into monumental tombs.
Another tomb at Hadra, dated to the third century, adds two
more elements that became characteristic of monumental Alexandria
hypogea. These included a court open to the sky and a funerary
couch painted to simulate alabaster or marble set on the short
wall of the funerary chamber opposite the entrance doorway. In
this tomb, the entrance consisted of a stairway with two
flights, the upper level of which led to a small landing,
while the lower level turned in a ninety degree angle before
leading to the corner of the square court. At the far end of
the court, a doorway opened into a rectangular funerary
chamber in which a funerary bench occupied the entire far
wall. Loculi were cut into the lateral walls and even behind
the funerary bed.
These tombs therefore grew into the simplest form of
monumental tombs. However, compared with later Alexandrian
monumental tombs, they are small in both vision and scale, and
at most, moderately decorated. They were apparently intended
to accommodate a single family in most instances.

Above: Hypogeum A just after it was
discovered
Below: Hypogeum A Today

Two of the earliest monumental tombs in Alexandria
are designated Hypogeum A and B, that sit side by side in the
ancient cemetery of Chatby. Unfortunately, Hypogeum B is no
longer extant. Also, Hypogeum A was only in fair condition
when it was discovered, and today has suffered further
deterioration due to weather conditions on the cost. It serves
as the earliest extant example of the elaborately conceived
monumental tombs of Alexandria. It has elements of both
Pagenstecher's peristyle and oikos tombs, and can be
considered a predecessor of both types.
This is a multi-chambered tomb accessed by a stairway that
was cut down through the rock. It mimics a monumental building
with a court open to the sky around which the burial chambers
and subsidiary rooms are arranged. The burial rooms within the
tomb incorporate architecturally elaborate loculi and two
klinai for burial, while its court accommodated an altar for
sacrifice. The only feature that is lacking is a well or
cistern, which was incorporated into later Ptolemaic period
tombs.
The earliest tombs, including those classified as
monumental at Alexandria,
are found in the eastern cemetery, and particularly at Chatby.
The cemetery at Chatby probably dates to the period almost
immediately following the foundation of the city. It begins
immediately east of the conjectured line of the city walls
near the sea at Chatby. Perhaps simultaneously, or at a
slightly later date, a second cemetery developed in the
southern area beyond the eastern wall in the quarter of
ancient Eleusis, which, during the nineteenth century,
corresponded to a village called Hadra. This area is now
incorporated into the city. However, during its use as a
cemetery, it began to develop northwards towards Chatby,
encompassing the regions of el-Manara, Ezbet el-Makhlouf and
the rue d'Aboukir. At the same time this cemetery was
expanding, a necropolis also developed to the west of the city
in a quarter now called Gabbari.
However, as the eastern cemetery grew, it spread farther
east along the sea, taking in areas that bear the Arabic names
of Ibrahimieh, Sidi Gabr and Moustapha Pasha (recently renamed
to Moustapha Kamel). Because many of the excavations of these
cemeteries were of an emergency nature due to the expanding
city, we do not know if this eastern necropolis stretched
continuously along the length of the eastern wall, or whether
it comprised a series of separate and distinct necropolises,
though the former is probable.
These cemeteries embraced Alexandria's
diverse population, and in fact it is often difficult to
recognize the ethnic character of the owners. Only in the
cases where people intentionally set themselves apart, mainly
Jews and Christians, are the ethnicity or cultural backgrounds
of dead distinguishable, and even then some are difficult to
identify. Though, during the Ptolemaic period, the more
elaborate tombs line the seashore, the social and economic
status of those buried in the tombs is also difficult to ascertain.
Certainly the disposition of the dead would have been
hierarchically determined, but many other factors entered into
play.
One reason for this is that while, initially, monumental
tombs were probably constructed for families, by the mid-third
century BC, many tombs were planned as communal burial places
for members of professional guilds, religious associations and
other fellowship societies. For example, one burial, known as
the Soldiers' Tomb, was built for Gauls who died in Alexandria.
From inscriptions, other tombs indicate that people of all
ethnic origins could generally share the same tombs, and
clearly, the size and number of loculus in the monumental
tombs of ancient Alexandria argue for a collective undertaking
and collective burial.
See Also:
Resources:
| Title |
Author |
Date |
Publisher |
Reference Number |
|
Alexandria, City of the Western Mind |
Vrettos, Theodore |
2001 |
Free Press, The |
ISBN 0-7432-0569-3 |
|
Alexander to Actium (The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age) |
Green, Peter |
1990 |
University of California Press |
ISBN 0-520-05611-6 |
|
Alexandria Rediscovered |
Empereur, Jean-Yves |
1998 |
British Museum Press |
ISBN 0-7141-1921-0 |
|
Atlas of Ancient Egypt |
Baines, John; Malek, Jaromir |
1980 |
Les Livres De France |
None Stated |
|
Monumental Tombs of Ancient Alexandria: The Theater of the Dead |
Venit, Marjorie Susan |
2002 |
Cambridge University Press |
ISBN 0 521 80659 3 |
|
Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt, The |
Redford, Donald B. (Editor) |
2001 |
American University in Cairo Press, The |
ISBN 977 424 581 4 |
Archives
|